I'm reading Pham Kim Hung's 'Secrets in Inequalities - Volume 1', and I have to say from the first few examples, that it is not a very good book. Definitely not beginner friendly.
Anyway, it is proven by the author, that for four variables a,b,c, and d, each being a non-negative real number, the following inequality holds:
ab+c+bc+d+cd+a+da+b≥2
I have no idea how the author proves this. It comes under the very first section, AM-GM. I get the original Nesbitt's inequality in 3 variables that the author proves (which is also cryptic, but I was able to decipher it).
My effort: I understood how the author defines the variables M,N and S.
S=ab+c+bc+d+cd+a+da+b
M=bb+c+cc+d+dd+a+aa+b
N=cb+c+dc+d+ad+a+ba+b
M+N=4, pretty straightforward. The numerators and denominators cross out to give four 1s.
Then the author, without any expansion/explanation, says
M+S=a+bb+c+b+cc+d+c+dd+a+d+aa+b≥4
Which is also true, since the AM-GM inequality says
M+S4≥(a+bb+c⋅b+cc+d⋅c+dd+a⋅d+aa+b)1/4
The RHS above evaluates to 11/4 since all the numerators and denominators cancel out.
The next part is the crux of my question.
The author claims,
N+S=a+cb+c+a+ca+d+b+dc+d+b+da+b≥4(a+c)a+b+c+d+4(b+d)a+b+c+d
This is completely bizarre for me! Where did the author manage to get a sum of (a+b+c+d)??
As a side note, I'd definitely not recommend this book for any beginner in basic algebraic inequalities (even though the title of the book promotes that it's a treatment of basic inequalities). The author takes certain 'leaps of faith', just assuming that the student reading the book would be able to follow.
Answer
Since we have (x−y)2≥0, we have, for x>0,y>0,
(x−y)2≥0⇒x2+y2+2xy≥4xy⇒y(x+y)+x(x+y)≥4xy⇒1x+1y≥4x+y
Now set x=b+c,y=a+d and x=c+d,y=a+b to get
1b+c+1a+d≥4b+c+a+d
No comments:
Post a Comment