I discovered the following conjecture by evaluating the integral numerically and then using some inverse symbolic calculation methods to find a possible closed form:
∫∞0lnx√x1 √x+1 √2x+1dx?=π3/2ln223/2Γ2(34).
The equality holds numerically with a precision of at least 1000 decimal digits. But so far I was not able to find a proof of it.
Because the integral can be represented as a derivative of a hypergeometic function with respect to its parameter, the conjecture can be rewritten as
dda2F1(a, 12; 1; 12)|a=12?=√πln22Γ2(34)
or, using a series expansion of the hypergeometric function, as
∑∞n=0Hn−12 Γ2(n+12)2n Γ2(n+1)?=−3π3/2ln22Γ2(34),
where Hq is the generalized harmonic number, Hq=γ+ψ0(q+1).
Could you suggest any ideas how to prove this?
Answer
I:=∫∞0ln(x)√x√x+1√2x+1dx.
After first multiplying and dividing the integrand by 2, substitute x=t2:
I=∫∞02ln(x)√2x√2x+2√2x+1dx=∫∞0ln(t2)√t√t+2√t+1dt.
Next, substituting t=1u yields:
I=−∫∞0ln(2u)√u√u+1√2u+1du=−∫∞0ln(2)√u√u+1√2u+1du−∫∞0ln(u)√u√u+1√2u+1du=−∫∞0ln(2)√u√u+1√2u+1du−I⟹I=−ln(2)2∫∞0dx√x√x+1√2x+1.
Making the sequence of substitutions x=u−12, then u=1t, and finally t=√w, puts this integral into the form of a beta function:
∫∞0dx√x√x+1√2x+1=∫∞1du√u−1√u+1√u=∫∞1du√u2−1√u=∫01t3/2√1−t2(−1)t2dt=∫10dt√t√1−t2=12∫10dww3/4√1−w=12B(14,12)=12Γ(12)Γ(14)Γ(34)=π3/221/2Γ2(34)
Hence,
I=−ln(2)2π3/221/2Γ2(34)=−π3/2ln(2)23/2Γ2(34). ◼
Possible Alternative: You could also derive the answer from the complete elliptic integral of the first kind instead of from the beta function by making the substitution t=z2 instead of t=√w.
∫∞0dx√x√x+1√2x+1=∫∞1du√u−1√u+1√u=∫∞1du√u2−1√u=∫01t3/2√1−t2(−1)t2dt=∫10dt√t√1−t2=2∫10dz√1−z4=2K(−1)=Γ2(14)2√2π=π3/221/2Γ2(34).
No comments:
Post a Comment