Saturday, 19 November 2016

number theory - What is the simplest way to prove that the logarithm of any prime is irrational?



What is the simplest way to prove that the logarithm of any prime is irrational?



I can get very close with a simple argument: if pq and logplogq=ab, then because qlogplogq=p, qa=pb, but this is impossible by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So the ratio of the logarithms of any two primes is irrational. Now, if logp is rational, then since logplogq is irrational, logq is also irrational. So, I can conclude that at most one prime has a rational logarithm.




I realize that the rest follows from the transcendence of e, but that proof is relatively complex, and all that's left to show is that no integer power of e is a prime power (because if logp is rational, then ea=pb has a solution). It is easy to prove that e is irrational (e=ab!=1n!, multiply by b! and separate the sum into integer and fractional parts) but I can't figure out how to generalize this simple proof to show that ex is irrational for all integer x; it introduces a xn term to the sum and the integer and fractional parts can no longer be separated. How to complete this argument, or what is a different elementary way to show that logp is always irrational?


Answer



A proof of the irrationality of rational powers of e is given on page 8 of Keith Conrad's notes.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...