Recall the general definition of a gcd in a commutative ring R.
For a∈R, D(a) is the set of elements that divide a and if S⊂R, D(S)=∩s∈SD(s)
We say that d is a gcd of a and b and we write d∈gcd whenever we have d \in \mathcal D(a,b) \subset \mathcal D(d) .
I would like to prove that, within the ring \mathbb Z every pair of natural numbers has a gcd, that is, \forall a,b \in \mathbb{N} \quad \gcd(a,b) \neq \emptyset .
Of course, they all have a gcd for the order in \mathbb Z, in which case I'd like to prove that the greatest common divisor for the order is a (the) greatest common divisor in the purely algebraic sense.
Once done, it almost goes without saying that the gcd is unique.
Indeed, since \forall x,y \in \mathbb N \quad (x|y \implies x \leq y), \quad \mathcal D(a,b) is bounded by \min(a,b) and has a unique maximal element. If a and b do have a gcd, then, once again by x|y \implies x \leq y the gcd can only be that maximal element.
Therefore, proving that a and b have a gcd is equivalent to proving that the greatest element of \mathcal D(a,b) (the "usual" greatest common divisor of a and b) is a gcd of a and b, that is, that every element of \mathcal D(a,b) divides its greatest element.
I'm stuck here.
Answer
\mathbf Z is a P.I.D., hence the ideal \langle a,b\rangle has a generator d, and every generator is unique modulo units. The units of \mathbf Z are \pm 1, so we can choose the positive generator.
By definition, a, b\in\langle d\rangle, so d\mid a, b.
On the other hand, we can write d=ua+vb for some u,v\in\mathbf Z since d\in\langle a,b\rangle. Let e be a common divisor of a and b: we can write a=a'e, b=b'e, so
d=ua'e+vb'e=(ua'+vb()e\in\langle e\rangle ,
which means e is a divisor of d.
Note
This proof is valid for any P.I.D., even if it has no Euclid's algorithm.
No comments:
Post a Comment