Thursday, 27 February 2014

complex numbers - When does sqrtwz=sqrtwsqrtz?



There exists a unique function :CC such that for all r[0,) and θ(π,π] it holds that rexp(iθ)=rexp(iθ/2),



where r denotes the usual principal square root of a real number r.



Lets take this as our definition of the principal square root of a complex number. Thus i=1.



Now. We know that, for all positive real w and z, it holds that wz=wz. We also know that this fails for certain complex w and z. Otherwise, we'd be allowed to argue as follows:




1=ii=11=11=1=1



My question: for which complex w and z does it hold that wz=wz?


Answer



The solution to this question requires the definition of the unwinding number. Check the paper The unwinding number by Corless and Jeffrey, SIGSAM Bulletin 116, pp. 28-35.



The unwinding number is defined by
ln(ez)=z+2πiK(z).


Obviously, K(z)Z.




For your question, Theorem 5 is the most relevant one, along with the point 1 in the second list in section 5.2:




  1. zw. By theorem (5c) we would expect this to expand to
    zweπiK(lnz+lnw)

    and this would not simplify further unless the assume system knew that π<argz+argwπ, in which case K would simplify to 0.



Read the paper for a deeper insight.



No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...