There exists a unique function √∗:C→C such that for all r∈[0,∞) and θ∈(−π,π] it holds that √rexp(iθ)=√rexp(iθ/2),
where √r denotes the usual principal square root of a real number r.
Lets take this as our definition of the principal square root of a complex number. Thus i=√−1.
Now. We know that, for all positive real w and z, it holds that √wz=√w√z. We also know that this fails for certain complex w and z. Otherwise, we'd be allowed to argue as follows:
−1=i⋅i=√−1⋅√−1=√−1⋅−1=√1=1
My question: for which complex w and z does it hold that √wz=√w√z?
Answer
The solution to this question requires the definition of the unwinding number. Check the paper The unwinding number by Corless and Jeffrey, SIGSAM Bulletin 116, pp. 28-35.
The unwinding number is defined by
ln(ez)=z+2πiK(z).
Obviously, K(z)∈Z.
For your question, Theorem 5 is the most relevant one, along with the point 1 in the second list in section 5.2:
- √zw. By theorem (5c) we would expect this to expand to
√z√weπiK(lnz+lnw)
and this would not simplify further unless the assume system knew that −π<argz+argw≤π, in which case K would simplify to 0.
Read the paper for a deeper insight.
No comments:
Post a Comment