Wednesday, 19 February 2014

number theory - Solving f(x)f(y)=f(x+y)





I am a little lost trying to derive what form f(x) must have if we know f(x)f(y)=f(x+y) for real inputs x,y.



My attempt so far:



Set y=0 and we have f(x)f(0)=f(x) meaning either f(x)=0 or f(0)=1. Not sure what to do with this.



What about setting y=x? Then f(x)2=f(2x). Multiply both sides by f(x) and then f(x)3=f(2x)f(x)=f(2x+x)=f(3x) and so on, so f(x)n=f(nx) for some integer n2. But it's also true for n=1 because f(x)1=f(1x)=f(x) and it's also true for n=0 (if we assume f(0)=1) since f(x)0=f(0x)=f(0)=1, so f(x)n=f(nx) holds for integer n0.



For n>0: raise both sides to 1/n and we get




f(x)=f(nx)1/n



I don't really know where I am going with this or if it's even the right track. Am I even allowed to do that in the first place? Am I supposed to be assuming f(x) is real? Or complex? Or positive? Or something? Should I be assuming x and y are complex? I don't really know what assumptions to make exactly. I'm just trying to prove/show that this all implies f(x) has some exponential form but pretending I don't know that yet.



Could use any corrections or a push in the right direction.


Answer



You're doing fine. So far you've managed to identify that either




  1. f is everywhere zero, or



  2. f(0)=1, in which case f(nx)=f(x)n for every positive integer n.




You can probably also manage to show that for every positive integer k, you have f(x/k)=f(x)1/k, and then combine these to conclude that for any rational number r, f(rx)=f(x)r.



A good next place to look is to say "let's say f(1)=A." Then we can work out f(2),f(3), and f(1/2),f(1/3),, and maybe even f(r) for every rational number r with a little cleverness.



But what about irrationals? To say anything useful there, I believe you need an added assumption like "f is continuous".



Post-comment additions




For things like this problem, it can be really helpful to write down everything in detail, rather than just as notes. You could, for instance, say this:



I'm studying the functional equation
f(x+y)=f(x)f(y),
which I'll assume is defined for x a real number, and that the values taken by f are also real, i.e., that I have
f:RR:xf(x)



Lemma 1: If f(0)=0, then f(x)=0 for all xR.



Proof: From equation 1, we have $f(x) = f(x + 0) = f(x) f(0) = f(x)\cdot 0 = 0.



Lemma 2: Assuming c=f(0)0, we have f(0)=1.
Proof: f(0)=f(0+0)=f(0)2, so c=c2, hence cc2=c(1c)=0, when c=0 or c=1. We've assumed c0, hence c=1. QED.



Henceforth we'll assume f(0)=1 and ignore the always-zero solution.




Lemma 3: For any xR, f(2x)=f(x)2;f(3x)=f(x)3.



Proof: f(2x)=f(x+x)=f(x)f(x) by equation 1. Similarly, breaking up f(3x)=f(2x)+f(x) establishes the second claim.



Lemma 4: For any positive integer n, f(nx)=f(x)n.
Proof, by induction: Let P(m) be the statement that for the positive integer m, and for every real number x, f(mx)=f(x)m. We know that for any real x, f(1x)=f(x)=f(x)1, so P(1) is true. Suppose that for some integer k, we know f(kx)=f(x)k (this is our induction hypothesis P(k)). Then let's examine f((k+1)x):
f((k+1)x)=f(kx+x)=f(kx)f(x)By equation 1=f(x)kf(x)By the induction hypothesis=f(x)k+1.
We see that P(k) implies P(k+1); combining this with the fact that P(1) is true, we find (by induction) that P(n) is true for all positive integers n.



...and you continue in this vein. It really helps to know what assumptions you're making in each step.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...