This is something I was shaky about when I took calculus, real analysis, and then complex analysis. Specifically, is the following chain of definitions circular in any way?
- Define the set N of natural numbers, define basic arithmetic operations
- Extend N to Z, then to Q, and extend the arithmetic operations to these sets as well
- Use the arithmetic operations to define distance and use that to define convergence, limit, and related concepts
- Use 3 to extend Q to R
- Define cosine and sine on R using the series definitions and then define other trig functions using cosine and sine
- Define e=lim and define \pi as \ldots
- Use 5 and 6 to derive the usual properties of trig functions, of e, and of \pi
- Define e^x, x real, as \lim(1+x/n)^n
- Finally, define, for z=x+iy, e^z=e^x(\cos y+i\sin y), and derive properties of e^z from 7 and 8 and complex arithmetic operations.
I also have 3 auxiliary questions: (i) what is a standard / convenient definition for \pi above? (ii) how does one fork off from 5 and 6 above to get the geometric interpretations of \pi and the trig functions? (iii) is there a book (or a few books) that give students a sort of big picture ("big" for a guy like me) view above?
No comments:
Post a Comment