Thursday, 21 August 2014

real analysis - Lebesgue measure paradox



See Lebesgue outer measure of [0,1]Q



Lebesgue measure:
m(A)=inf{|In|:AIn}




We know that m(Q[0,1])=0.



Proof:



Enumerate the rationals Q[0,1]={qn}nN.



Let An be the covering of rationals {qn}nN in [0,1] by intervals An=(qnε/2n,qn+ε/2n). Then,
m(Q[0,1])m(An)n|An|=nε2n=ε


and since it is true for every ϵ>0 as small as we want, we have m(Q[0,1])=0.




Paradox?



Every number in [0,1] is contained in an open neighborhood of a rational number. We reach a paradox if nNAn=[0,1]


since then
m([0,1])m(An)m(An)=ε

and then m([0,1])=0 and not 1 as it should be.



To contradict this we need to show
An[0,1] .



We need to build an irrational number r such that n:|rqn|>ε/2n. Can you construct such a number (or prove it exists without using Lebesgue measure argument)?



Moreover, I think we need to show the set [0,1]An has =20 elements. Otherwise, m([0,1]An)=0 and we reach a contradiction.


Answer



If I may choose the enumeration of the rationals:



Enumerate the rationals in increasing order of the denominator in the reduced form, rationals with the same denominator in increasing order, so



q1=01,q2=11,q3=12,q4=13,q5=23,q6=14,q7=34,




Then for qn=rnsn, we have snn.



For x=12, and a rational 0rs1, we have



|rs12|=|r2s212||rs+12||2r2s2|4s214s2.



For 0<ε<29, we have 14n2>ε2n for all n1, hence 1/2 is not contained in any (qnε2n,qn+ε2n).



By a similar reasoning, we find 20 irrationals that aren't covered:




For an irrational x(0,1) with continued fraction expansion



x=[a0,a1,a2,],



convergents rnsn, and the complete quotients αn - that means



x=αn+1rn+rn1αn+1sn+sn1,



and thus the continued fraction expansion αn=[an,an+1,], whence an<αn<an+1 - we have




|xrnsn|=|αn+1rn+rn1αn+1sn+sn1rnsn|=|αn+1(rnsnsnrn)+(rn1snrnsn1)(αn+1sn+sn1)sn|=|(1)n(αn+1sn+sn1)sn|>1((an+1+1)sn+sn1)sn1(an+1+2)s2n.



For a rational number rs with ssn, n1, we have




|sxr||snxrn|



with equality if and only if s=sn and r=rn.



This immediately leads to



|xrs|>1(an+1+2)ssn.



Thus, for any fixed MZ+, let AM be the set of all irrational numbers in (0,1) whose continued fraction expansion has all partial quotients M.




For M2, the set AM has cardinality 20.



For xAM, the denominators of the convergents satisfy



sn+1=an+1sn+sn1Msn+sn1(M+1)sn.



Choosing the minimal n with sns in (2), we deduce



|xrs|>1(M+2)(M+1)s2




from (3) for xAM.



If ε is small enough, so that



1(M+2)2n2>ε2n



for all n, the set



Uε=n=1(qnε2n,qn+ε2n)




doesn't intersect AM.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...