See Lebesgue outer measure of [0,1]∩Q
Lebesgue measure:
m(A)=inf{∑|In|:A⊂⋃In}
We know that m(Q∩[0,1])=0.
Proof:
Enumerate the rationals Q∩[0,1]={qn}n∈N.
Let An be the covering of rationals {qn}n∈N in [0,1] by intervals An=(qn−ε/2n,qn+ε/2n). Then,
m(Q∩[0,1])≤m(⋃An)≤∑n|An|=∑nε2n=ε
and since it is true for every ϵ>0 as small as we want, we have m(Q∩[0,1])=0. ◻
Paradox?
Every number in [0,1] is contained in an open neighborhood of a rational number. We reach a paradox if ⋃n∈NAn=[0,1]
since then
m([0,1])≤m(⋃An)≤∑m(An)=ε
and then m([0,1])=0 and not 1 as it should be.
To contradict this we need to show
⋃An≠[0,1] .
We need to build an irrational number r such that ∀n:|r−qn|>ε/2n. Can you construct such a number (or prove it exists without using Lebesgue measure argument)?
Moreover, I think we need to show the set [0,1]−⋃An has ℵ=2ℵ0 elements. Otherwise, m([0,1]−⋃An)=0 and we reach a contradiction.
Answer
If I may choose the enumeration of the rationals:
Enumerate the rationals in increasing order of the denominator in the reduced form, rationals with the same denominator in increasing order, so
q1=01,q2=11,q3=12,q4=13,q5=23,q6=14,q7=34,…
Then for qn=rnsn, we have sn⩽n.
For x=1√2, and a rational 0⩽rs⩽1, we have
|rs−1√2|=|r2s2−12||rs+1√2|⩾|2r2−s2|4s2⩾14s2.
For 0<ε<29, we have 14n2>ε2n for all n⩾1, hence 1/√2 is not contained in any (qn−ε2−n,qn+ε2−n).
By a similar reasoning, we find 2ℵ0 irrationals that aren't covered:
For an irrational x∈(0,1) with continued fraction expansion
x=[a0,a1,a2,…],
convergents rnsn, and the complete quotients αn - that means
x=αn+1rn+rn−1αn+1sn+sn−1,
and thus the continued fraction expansion αn=[an,an+1,…], whence an<αn<an+1 - we have
|x−rnsn|=|αn+1rn+rn−1αn+1sn+sn−1−rnsn|=|αn+1(rnsn−snrn)+(rn−1sn−rnsn−1)(αn+1sn+sn−1)sn|=|(−1)n(αn+1sn+sn−1)sn|>1((an+1+1)sn+sn−1)sn⩾1(an+1+2)s2n.
For a rational number rs with s⩽sn, n⩾1, we have
|sx−r|⩾|snx−rn|
with equality if and only if s=sn and r=rn.
This immediately leads to
|x−rs|>1(an+1+2)s⋅sn.
Thus, for any fixed M∈Z+, let AM be the set of all irrational numbers in (0,1) whose continued fraction expansion has all partial quotients ⩽M.
For M⩾2, the set AM has cardinality 2ℵ0.
For x∈AM, the denominators of the convergents satisfy
sn+1=an+1sn+sn−1⩽M⋅sn+sn−1⩽(M+1)⋅sn.
Choosing the minimal n with sn⩾s in (2), we deduce
|x−rs|>1(M+2)(M+1)s2
from (3) for x∈AM.
If ε is small enough, so that
1(M+2)2n2>ε2n
for all n, the set
Uε=∞⋃n=1(qn−ε2n,qn+ε2n)
doesn't intersect AM.
No comments:
Post a Comment