Sunday, 9 February 2014

integration - Frullani 's theorem in a complex context.




It is possible to prove that 0eixexxdx=iπ2

and in this case the Frullani's theorem does not hold since, if we consider the function f(x)=ex, we should have 0eaxebxxdx
where a,b>0. But if we apply this theorem, we get 0eixexxdx=log(1i)=iπ2
which is the right result.




Questions: is it only a coincidence? Is it possible to generalize the theorem to complex numbers? Is it a known result? And if it is, where can I find a proof of it?




Thank you.


Answer





The following development provides a possible way forward to generalizing Frullani's Theorem for complex parameters.




Let a and b be complex numbers such that arg(a)arg(b)+nπ, ab0, and let ϵ and R be positive numbers.



In the complex plane, let C be the closed contour defined by the line segments (i) from aϵ to aR, (ii) from aR to bR, (iii) from bR to bϵ, and (iv) from bϵ to aϵ.



Let f be analytic in and on C for all ϵ and R. Using Cauchy's Integral Theorem, we can write



0=Cf(z)zdz=Rϵf(ax)f(bx)xdx+10f(aR+(ba)Rt)a+(ba)t(ba)dt10f(aϵ+(ba)ϵt)a+(ba)t(ba)dt



Rearranging (1) reveals that



Rϵf(ax)f(bx)xdx=10f(aϵ+(ba)ϵt)a+(ba)t(ba)dt10f(aR+(ba)Rt)a+(ba)t(ba)dt



If limR10f(aR+(ba)Rt)a+(ba)t(ba)dt=0, then we find that



0f(ax)f(bx)xdx=f(0)(ba)101a+(ba)tdt=f(0)log(|b/a|)+if(0)(arctan(Re(aˉb)|a|2Im(aˉb))arctan(|b|2Re(aˉb)Im(aˉb)))




Since (ab)101a+(ba)tdt, ab0 is continuous in a and b, then (3) is valid for arg(a)=arg(b)+nπ also.







Note that the tangent of the term in large parentheses on the right-hand side of (3) is



Im(ˉab)Re(ˉab)=tan(arctan(Re(aˉb)|a|2Im(aˉb))arctan(|b|2Re(aˉb)Im(aˉb)))=tan(arctan(Im(b)Re(b))arctan(Im(a)Re(a)))



No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...