It is possible to prove that ∫∞0e−ix−e−xxdx=−iπ2
Questions: is it only a coincidence? Is it possible to generalize the theorem to complex numbers? Is it a known result? And if it is, where can I find a proof of it?
Thank you.
Answer
The following development provides a possible way forward to generalizing Frullani's Theorem for complex parameters.
Let a and b be complex numbers such that arg(a)≠arg(b)+nπ, ab≠0, and let ϵ and R be positive numbers.
In the complex plane, let C be the closed contour defined by the line segments (i) from aϵ to aR, (ii) from aR to bR, (iii) from bR to bϵ, and (iv) from bϵ to aϵ.
Let f be analytic in and on C for all ϵ and R. Using Cauchy's Integral Theorem, we can write
0=∮Cf(z)zdz=∫Rϵf(ax)−f(bx)xdx+∫10f(aR+(b−a)Rt)a+(b−a)t(b−a)dt−∫10f(aϵ+(b−a)ϵt)a+(b−a)t(b−a)dt
Rearranging (1) reveals that
∫Rϵf(ax)−f(bx)xdx=∫10f(aϵ+(b−a)ϵt)a+(b−a)t(b−a)dt−∫10f(aR+(b−a)Rt)a+(b−a)t(b−a)dt
If limR→∞∫10f(aR+(b−a)Rt)a+(b−a)t(b−a)dt=0, then we find that
∫∞0f(ax)−f(bx)xdx=f(0)(b−a)∫101a+(b−a)tdt=f(0)log(|b/a|)+if(0)(arctan(Re(aˉb)−|a|2Im(aˉb))−arctan(|b|2−Re(aˉb)Im(aˉb)))
Since (a−b)∫101a+(b−a)tdt, ab≠0 is continuous in a and b, then (3) is valid for arg(a)=arg(b)+nπ also.
Note that the tangent of the term in large parentheses on the right-hand side of (3) is
Im(ˉab)Re(ˉab)=tan(arctan(Re(aˉb)−|a|2Im(aˉb))−arctan(|b|2−Re(aˉb)Im(aˉb)))=tan(arctan(Im(b)Re(b))−arctan(Im(a)Re(a)))
No comments:
Post a Comment