Before I ask anything, let me first express my apologies for this question.
Would somebody please explain what Limits truly are? Why do we need to take Limits? Wen would we use Limits? How can we actually evaluate a function at a point where it does not exist (for example: how is 10=∞?)?
I woul be truly grateful if somebody could please help clear these doubts I face. Many many thanks in advance.
Answer
Limits are about how functions behave close to but NOT at the chosen point. When you speak about limx→0f(x) the information you get is about what f(x) does for small nonzero values of x. The limit doesn't care about what f(0) or even whether f(0) has a defined value.
It is definitely wrong to think of limx→01x=∞ as a claim that 10=∞. On the contrary limx→0f(x) has nothing to do with what f does at 0 -- only what it does near 0.
For example, consider g(x)={2when x=01+xotherwise.
(Sketch a graph of this!). Then we have that limx→0g(x)=1, no matter that g(0) is 2 rather than 1.
In the particular case that the function is continuous, the limit limx→af(x) will be the same as f(a), but that is a special case that you cannot rely on as an explanation of what a limit is -- on the contrary the point that this identity isn't always true, which it why it can be used as a technical definition of "continuous".
But a limit MUST NOT be thought of as just a roundabout way to evaluate the function.
How about limits being infinity? That's because a function can behave in several different ways near-but-not-at 0. Some of them are common enough that we give them names. Coming near a particular number is one named behavior; we then say that this number is the limit.
But if there's no number the function comes near -- such that in the 1x case -- the function may still behave in a way that it is useful to recognize to have a way to speak about. For example 1x has the property that when x approaches 0, the value of 1x moves away from every number. This property is what we notate as limx→0f(x)=∞. It doesn't mean that ∞ is a number that f(x) goes towards; ∞ is not a number! It's just suggestive notation that is chosen to look like that of limx→0g(x)=1 to make it easier to remember, even though its technical definition is different.
Beware that limx→0f(x)=∞ does not merely mean that the limit isn't a number. There are functions where limx→0 is neither a number nor ∞. For example, consider:
h(x)=sin(1/x)x defined on R∖{0}
It has the strange property that for every real number we can find a small nonzero x -- which can be as small as we want! -- such that h(x) is that number. This means that h doesn't have any number as its limit for x→0 -- the informal definition you have seen may not make this clear, in which case you should pester your teacher to explain why not -- and it doesn't have ∞ as a limit either.
We would say that limx→0sin(1/x)x is not defined, which means neither more nor less than we haven't chosen a word or notation for this kind of behavior yet.
If we want to, we can perfectly well choose a notation for speaking about h-like behavior -- for example, we could decide to write
limx→0sin(1/x)x=↕
Of course we'd need to give a proper definition of what exactly we mean by that, but once that is done limx→0sin(1/x)x would not be undefined any more.
No comments:
Post a Comment