Saturday, 17 June 2017

number theory - Prove that m2013m20+m132013 has at least N prime divisors



for positive integer N>1,There always exists m such that
m2013m20+m132013
has at least N prime divisors




Thank you all, this is good problem, but I don't know how to solve it.


Answer



The following solution deliberately avoids finding the prime factorization of 2013, thanks to the rather generous exponents occuring in the given expression.



Let's introduce the p-adic valuation: If pP is a prime and nZ{0} let vp(n) denote the exponent of p in n, that is vp(n)=max. For convenience, v_p(0)=+\infty. Then \tag1v_p(ab)=v_p(a)+v_p(b) and \tag2v_p(a\pm b)\ge\min\{v_p(a),v_p(b)\} and more specifically
\tag3v_p(a\pm b)=\min\{v_p(a),v_p(b)\}\quad \text{if }v_p(a)\ne v_p(b).
Right from 2013<2^{11} we get the (awfully crude) estimate
\tag4 v_p(2013)<11\quad\text{for all }p\in\mathbb P.
Let

S=\{p\in\mathbb P\mid\exists m\colon m^{2013}-m^{20}+m^{13}-2013\equiv 0\pmod p\} be the set of primes occuring as prime divisors of the considered expression.
For example, \tag5 p\in\mathbb P,\, p|2013\implies p\in S follows from considering m=0.



Assume that the set S is finite.
Let M=\prod_{p\in S}p.




  • If p is a prime \notin S, then v_p(M^{2013}-M^{20}+M^{13}-2013)=0 by definition of S and also v_p(2013)=0 because of (5).

  • And for p\in S, we have v_p(M^{2013}-M^{20}+M^{13})\ge 13v_p(M)\ge 13>v_p(2013) from (1), (2), and (4); hence v_p(M^{2013}-M^{20}+M^{13}-2013)=v_p(2013) by (3).




Thus v_p(M^{2013}-M^{20}+M^{13}-2013)=v_p(2013) for all primes p. This implies M^{2013}-M^{20}+M^{13}-2013=\pm2013.
But from (5) we have S\ne\emptyset, i.e. M\ge 2 and hence \begin{align}M^{2013}-M^{20}+M^{13}-2013&=(M^{1993}-1)M^{20}+M^{13}-2013\\&>M^{13}-2013\ge2^{13}-2013>2013,\end{align} contradiction!
We conclude from this contradiction that the set S is infinite.



Given N, we can therefore select N distinct primes p_k\in S, k=1,\ldots, N.
For each k, there exists m_k\in\mathbb Z such that m_k^{2013}-m_k^{20}+m_k^{13}-2013\equiv 0\pmod{p_k}.
Using the Chinese remainder theorem, there exists m\in\mathbb N such that m\equiv m_k\pmod{p_k} for all k. Then
m^{2013}-m^{20}+m^{13}-2013\equiv m_k^{2013}-m_k^{20}+m_k^{13}-2013\equiv 0\pmod{p_k},
i.e. at least the N different primes p_k are divisors of m^{2013}-m^{20}+m^{13}-2013.







Remark: The same argument works with any expression of the form m^rf(m)+c, where f is a polynomial and c is not divisible by any rth prime power and f(m)\ge1 if m\ge \prod_{p|c}p.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}

How to find \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h} without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...