I have trouble understanding why, when finding the limit of a recurrently defined sequence, we can assume that xn=xn+1 to find the actual limit.
I figured it's got something to do with the fact that lim and intuitively that makes perfect sense, but it's the theory behind it that evades my understanding (we can't just say that "because |x_n-x_{n+1}| for high enough n is very close to zero, we might aswell make them equal", right?)
Example: In x_1=0 , x_{n+1}=\frac{1}{1+x_n} I'd use the equality L=\frac{1}{1+L}
This question probably isn't very well formulated, but that comes from my lack of understanding of the problem, sorry! (and thanks for the answer :)
Answer
We don't really assume that x_n=x_{n+1}. Instead, suppose that the limit exists, call it x. Then \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n=x. This, by definition of limit, means that for every \epsilon>0 there is a N\in\mathbb N such that for all n>N we have |x_n-x|<\epsilon. Intuitively, for every \epsilon>0, the sequence is \epsilon-close to x from some place on.
Now, we will show that it follows that \lim_{n\to\infty}x_{n+1}=x. Let \epsilon>0. Then for n>N we have n+1>N and therefore by the previous paragraph, |x_{n+1}-x|<\epsilon. So, for all n>N, the inequality |x_{n+1}-x|<\epsilon holds. This means that for every \epsilon>0, the number x_{n+1} is also \epsilon-close to x for all n>N, i.e. the limit exists and is equal to x.
Similarly, we can show that if \lim_{n\to\infty}x_{n+1}=x, then \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n=x. To see this, just write out what \lim_{n\to\infty}x_{n+1}=x means in terms of \epsilon, N and n. Then you will be able to show that x_n is \epsilon-close to x for all n>N+1.
What all this means is that \lim_{n\to\infty}x_n=x holds precisely if \lim_{n\to\infty}x_{n+1}=x holds, i.e. the conditions are equivalent.
No comments:
Post a Comment