What is wrong with this proof?
Theorem. 3 is less than 1.
Proof. Every number is either less than 1 or greater than 1
or equals 1. Let $c$ be an arbitrary number. Therefore, it is less
than 1 or greater than 1 or equals 1. Suppose it is less than 1. By the
rule of universal generalization, if an arbitrary number is less than 1,
every number is less than 1. Therefore, 3 is less than 1.
Wednesday, 18 January 2017
What is wrong with this proof that 3 is less than 1?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
real analysis - How to find $lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}$
How to find $\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h}$ without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...
-
Self-studying some properties of the exponential-function I came to the question of ways to assign a value to the divergent sum $$s=\sum_{k=...
-
Ok, according to some notes I have, the following is true for a random variable $X$ that can only take on positive values, i.e $P(X $\int_0^...
-
I use Euclidean Algorithm: 4620 = 101 * 45 + 75. long story short. I get 3 = 2 * 1 + 1. After that 2 = 1 * 2 + 0. gcd(101,4620) = 1. So I us...
No comments:
Post a Comment