Thursday, 24 September 2015

elementary set theory - Why is |Yemptyset|=1 but |emptysetY|=0 where Yneqemptyset




I have a question about the set of functions from a set to another set. I am wondering about the degenerate cases. Suppose XY denotes the set of functions from a set Y to a set X, why is |Y|=1 but |Y|=0 where Y?


Answer



The definition of AB is "the set of all functions with domain B and codomain A".



A function f from B to A is a set of ordered pairs such that:




  1. If (x,y)f, then xB and yA.

  2. For every bB there exists aA such that (b,a)f.


  3. If (b,a) and (b,a) are in f, then a=a.



Now, what happens if B=? Well, then there can be no pair in f, because you cannot have xB. But notice that in that case, 2 is satisfied "by vacuity" (if it were false, you would be able to exhibit a b for which there is no aA with (b,a)f; but there are no b, so you cannot make such an exhibition; the statement is true because the premise, "b", can never hold). Likewise 3 holds by vacuity. So it turns out that if we take f=, then f satisfies 1, 2, and 3, and therefore it is by all rights a "function from to A". But this is the only possible function from to A, because only the empty set works.



By contrast, if A=, but B, then no set f can satisfy both 1 and 2, so no set can be a function from B to A.



That means that Y always contains exactly one element, namely the "empty function", . But if Y, then Y contains no elements; that is, it is empty.



Therefore, since Y has exactly one element, |Y|=1 regardless of what Y is. But if Y, then Y is empty, so |Y|=0.



No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...