Tuesday, 10 January 2017

real analysis - Principle of well ordering




Every non-empty set AN have a smallest element, i.e. an
element n0A such that n0n nA





Proof:



Let In={pN;pn} the set of natural numbers less than or equal to n. If 1A then 1 will be the lower element. However if 1A then take X the set of natural numbers such that InNA. Knowing that I1= {1}NA then 1X. On the other hand knowing that A, we can conclude that XN. So there should be nX such that n+1X. Thus In={1,2,,n}NA but n0=n+1A. Then n0 is the smaller element in A



Is there any easier way to prove it?


Answer



I would write it as:



Let P(n) stand for the expression:




xn(xA)



Then use the assumption that A has no least element to prove that P(1) and P(n)P(n+1). Thus, we've shown that x:xA, which means A is empty.



That's essentially the same as your proof, but uses less set notation.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...